Out means out
Leave means Leave
Brexit means Brexit
Will of the people
Betrayal of democracy
Soundbites are great
comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 1 hour, 6 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff JW Pepper (U1007)
posted 1 hour, 19 minutes ago
I want that blustering facker wheeled off to the tower the second he returns to the country....Cameron was right
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's not enough of a punishment
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It'd be a start
If you looked at a menu and opted for a pie, then the waiter came over and said that it's a poo filled pie or the option of a pie with no filling. You'd still go with that because you chose a pie. You were told it was delicious. That's why you chose it. Now have your pie and eat it.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 17 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 9 minutes ago
"The Country voted to leave."
#simplism
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The majority voted to leave
#desperatepedant
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What's pedantic about what I said?
What you're saying is overly simplistic. WE VOTED TO LEAVE is not enough detail I'm afraid.
You had a deal and the people who voted for Brexit didn't want it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Firstly you are being pedantic. Democracy when determined on a majority basis is pretty black and white. 10000 constituents vote for blue 9999 vote for red, blue wins and gets his seat in parliament! Leave won, we therefore leave. ( i voted remain BTW).
Secondly, "we" had a deal and it was a damn-sight more than the Brexiteers that voted it down and that was not on the basis that they didnt want to fulfil the will of the people, it was that they didnt like the details of how. That is what the debate should be. HOW not IF. And that is clearly why Boris acted the way he did because he knew there were too many that would obstruct any means of HOW. (I'm not condoning it, but at least it was decisive action)
comment by Finlay Robertson (U1734)
posted 12 seconds ago
If you looked at a menu and opted for a pie, then the waiter came over and said that it's a poo filled pie or the option of a pie with no filling. You'd still go with that because you chose a pie. You were told it was delicious. That's why you chose it. Now have your pie and eat it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you are stupid enough to not ask what is in the pie then you're an idiot.
If you bothered to ask and they said it could be anything from steak to shiiiit, you'd take a view and decide accordingly, aware of the potential range of outcomes.
A big majority of MP's voted to trigger article 50 so it's a moot point about it being advisory or not
comment by Finlay Robertson (U1734)
posted 1 minute ago
If you looked at a menu and opted for a pie, then the waiter came over and said that it's a poo filled pie or the option of a pie with no filling. You'd still go with that because you chose a pie. You were told it was delicious. That's why you chose it. Now have your pie and eat it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd have gone cornish pasty...you know what you get in that
Devonshirespur (U6316)
I don't think you understand what 'pedantic' means - there's nothing pedantic about me saying you're being simplistic.
Leave doesn't mean leave.
What was voted for when people selected 'leave' is a myriad of options that no one can agree on.
There's your problem.
It literally is
———
You obviously haven’t been paying attention.
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 57 seconds ago
comment by Finlay Robertson (U1734)
posted 12 seconds ago
If you looked at a menu and opted for a pie, then the waiter came over and said that it's a poo filled pie or the option of a pie with no filling. You'd still go with that because you chose a pie. You were told it was delicious. That's why you chose it. Now have your pie and eat it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you are stupid enough to not ask what is in the pie then you're an idiot.
If you bothered to ask and they said it could be anything from steak to shiiiit, you'd take a view and decide accordingly, aware of the potential range of outcomes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was told it was steak before I ordered. Wasn't allowed to change my mind when I found out it was poo or no filling
comment by Mason The King Greenwood (U10026)
posted 50 seconds ago
It literally is
———
You obviously haven’t been paying attention.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
well done ignoring the rest of the post
comment by 8bit (U2653)
posted 4 minutes ago
A big majority of MP's voted to trigger article 50 so it's a moot point about it being advisory or not
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where does it say in law that Brexit must be implemented by triggering article 50?
The rest of the post doesn’t support your argument.
comment by Finlay Robertson (U1734)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 57 seconds ago
comment by Finlay Robertson (U1734)
posted 12 seconds ago
If you looked at a menu and opted for a pie, then the waiter came over and said that it's a poo filled pie or the option of a pie with no filling. You'd still go with that because you chose a pie. You were told it was delicious. That's why you chose it. Now have your pie and eat it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you are stupid enough to not ask what is in the pie then you're an idiot.
If you bothered to ask and they said it could be anything from steak to shiiiit, you'd take a view and decide accordingly, aware of the potential range of outcomes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was told it was steak before I ordered. Wasn't allowed to change my mind when I found out it was poo or no filling
----------------------------------------------------------------------
it's part of article 50, we automatically leave after two years deal or no deal. Hence why parliament have to keep forcing extentions to prevent us leaving.
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Finlay Robertson (U1734)
posted 12 seconds ago
If you looked at a menu and opted for a pie, then the waiter came over and said that it's a poo filled pie or the option of a pie with no filling. You'd still go with that because you chose a pie. You were told it was delicious. That's why you chose it. Now have your pie and eat it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you are stupid enough to not ask what is in the pie then you're an idiot.
If you bothered to ask and they said it could be anything from steak to shiiiit, you'd take a view and decide accordingly, aware of the potential range of outcomes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your dietary requirements would also not be best served demanding a meat pie in a vegan restaurant.
And then threating the owners that you’ll just walk out without buying a pie because they can’t sell you a meat pie.
Parliament making measures to stop no deal is not Parliament trying to overturn the referendum result. It amazes me that people with access to the internet cannot see this.
comment by Finlay Robertson (U1734)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 57 seconds ago
comment by Finlay Robertson (U1734)
posted 12 seconds ago
If you looked at a menu and opted for a pie, then the waiter came over and said that it's a poo filled pie or the option of a pie with no filling. You'd still go with that because you chose a pie. You were told it was delicious. That's why you chose it. Now have your pie and eat it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you are stupid enough to not ask what is in the pie then you're an idiot.
If you bothered to ask and they said it could be anything from steak to shiiiit, you'd take a view and decide accordingly, aware of the potential range of outcomes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was told it was steak before I ordered. Wasn't allowed to change my mind when I found out it was poo or no filling
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who knew poo pie could so eloquently put a leaver in their place.
comment by Mason The King Greenwood (U10026)
posted 2 minutes ago
The rest of the post doesn’t support your argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You said it's not because of parliament that we haven't left yet... we would have left if parliament didn't vote for extentions.
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Better than Goze... (U3126)
posted 17 seconds ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Finlay Robertson (U1734)
posted 12 seconds ago
If you looked at a menu and opted for a pie, then the waiter came over and said that it's a poo filled pie or the option of a pie with no filling. You'd still go with that because you chose a pie. You were told it was delicious. That's why you chose it. Now have your pie and eat it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you are stupid enough to not ask what is in the pie then you're an idiot.
If you bothered to ask and they said it could be anything from steak to shiiiit, you'd take a view and decide accordingly, aware of the potential range of outcomes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your dietary requirements would also not be best served demanding a meat pie in a vegan restaurant.
And then threating the owners that you’ll just walk out without buying a pie because they can’t sell you a meat pie.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Still the pasty for me
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
Devonshirespur (U6316)
I don't think you understand what 'pedantic' means - there's nothing pedantic about me saying you're being simplistic.
Leave doesn't mean leave.
What was voted for when people selected 'leave' is a myriad of options that no one can agree on.
There's your problem.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?
Remain a member of the European Union
Leave the European Union"
That is the question and the options.
So how does leave not mean leave when given a yes or no question?
Nick Eardley
PM accuses claimants in Supreme Court case of trying to frustrate Brexit.....
David Allen Green
PM's lawyer told Supreme Court that prorogation has nothing to do with Brexit
Devonshirespur (U6316)
Yes, and stating that is the question is simplism.
Because it isn't as simple as that.
'Leave' has many different guises. Shouting 'WE VOTED TO LEAVE' ignores the complexities involved.
No I said it’s not because Parliament is trying to overturnthe result.
Sign in if you want to comment
Boris Johnson
Page 6 of 14
7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11
posted on 24/9/19
Out means out
Leave means Leave
Brexit means Brexit
Will of the people
Betrayal of democracy
Soundbites are great
posted on 24/9/19
comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 1 hour, 6 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff JW Pepper (U1007)
posted 1 hour, 19 minutes ago
I want that blustering facker wheeled off to the tower the second he returns to the country....Cameron was right
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's not enough of a punishment
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It'd be a start
posted on 24/9/19
If you looked at a menu and opted for a pie, then the waiter came over and said that it's a poo filled pie or the option of a pie with no filling. You'd still go with that because you chose a pie. You were told it was delicious. That's why you chose it. Now have your pie and eat it.
posted on 24/9/19
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 17 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 9 minutes ago
"The Country voted to leave."
#simplism
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The majority voted to leave
#desperatepedant
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What's pedantic about what I said?
What you're saying is overly simplistic. WE VOTED TO LEAVE is not enough detail I'm afraid.
You had a deal and the people who voted for Brexit didn't want it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Firstly you are being pedantic. Democracy when determined on a majority basis is pretty black and white. 10000 constituents vote for blue 9999 vote for red, blue wins and gets his seat in parliament! Leave won, we therefore leave. ( i voted remain BTW).
Secondly, "we" had a deal and it was a damn-sight more than the Brexiteers that voted it down and that was not on the basis that they didnt want to fulfil the will of the people, it was that they didnt like the details of how. That is what the debate should be. HOW not IF. And that is clearly why Boris acted the way he did because he knew there were too many that would obstruct any means of HOW. (I'm not condoning it, but at least it was decisive action)
posted on 24/9/19
comment by Finlay Robertson (U1734)
posted 12 seconds ago
If you looked at a menu and opted for a pie, then the waiter came over and said that it's a poo filled pie or the option of a pie with no filling. You'd still go with that because you chose a pie. You were told it was delicious. That's why you chose it. Now have your pie and eat it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you are stupid enough to not ask what is in the pie then you're an idiot.
If you bothered to ask and they said it could be anything from steak to shiiiit, you'd take a view and decide accordingly, aware of the potential range of outcomes.
posted on 24/9/19
A big majority of MP's voted to trigger article 50 so it's a moot point about it being advisory or not
posted on 24/9/19
comment by Finlay Robertson (U1734)
posted 1 minute ago
If you looked at a menu and opted for a pie, then the waiter came over and said that it's a poo filled pie or the option of a pie with no filling. You'd still go with that because you chose a pie. You were told it was delicious. That's why you chose it. Now have your pie and eat it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd have gone cornish pasty...you know what you get in that
posted on 24/9/19
Devonshirespur (U6316)
I don't think you understand what 'pedantic' means - there's nothing pedantic about me saying you're being simplistic.
Leave doesn't mean leave.
What was voted for when people selected 'leave' is a myriad of options that no one can agree on.
There's your problem.
posted on 24/9/19
It literally is
———
You obviously haven’t been paying attention.
posted on 24/9/19
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 57 seconds ago
comment by Finlay Robertson (U1734)
posted 12 seconds ago
If you looked at a menu and opted for a pie, then the waiter came over and said that it's a poo filled pie or the option of a pie with no filling. You'd still go with that because you chose a pie. You were told it was delicious. That's why you chose it. Now have your pie and eat it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you are stupid enough to not ask what is in the pie then you're an idiot.
If you bothered to ask and they said it could be anything from steak to shiiiit, you'd take a view and decide accordingly, aware of the potential range of outcomes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was told it was steak before I ordered. Wasn't allowed to change my mind when I found out it was poo or no filling
posted on 24/9/19
comment by Mason The King Greenwood (U10026)
posted 50 seconds ago
It literally is
———
You obviously haven’t been paying attention.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
well done ignoring the rest of the post
posted on 24/9/19
comment by 8bit (U2653)
posted 4 minutes ago
A big majority of MP's voted to trigger article 50 so it's a moot point about it being advisory or not
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where does it say in law that Brexit must be implemented by triggering article 50?
posted on 24/9/19
The rest of the post doesn’t support your argument.
posted on 24/9/19
comment by Finlay Robertson (U1734)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 57 seconds ago
comment by Finlay Robertson (U1734)
posted 12 seconds ago
If you looked at a menu and opted for a pie, then the waiter came over and said that it's a poo filled pie or the option of a pie with no filling. You'd still go with that because you chose a pie. You were told it was delicious. That's why you chose it. Now have your pie and eat it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you are stupid enough to not ask what is in the pie then you're an idiot.
If you bothered to ask and they said it could be anything from steak to shiiiit, you'd take a view and decide accordingly, aware of the potential range of outcomes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was told it was steak before I ordered. Wasn't allowed to change my mind when I found out it was poo or no filling
----------------------------------------------------------------------
it's part of article 50, we automatically leave after two years deal or no deal. Hence why parliament have to keep forcing extentions to prevent us leaving.
posted on 24/9/19
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Finlay Robertson (U1734)
posted 12 seconds ago
If you looked at a menu and opted for a pie, then the waiter came over and said that it's a poo filled pie or the option of a pie with no filling. You'd still go with that because you chose a pie. You were told it was delicious. That's why you chose it. Now have your pie and eat it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you are stupid enough to not ask what is in the pie then you're an idiot.
If you bothered to ask and they said it could be anything from steak to shiiiit, you'd take a view and decide accordingly, aware of the potential range of outcomes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your dietary requirements would also not be best served demanding a meat pie in a vegan restaurant.
And then threating the owners that you’ll just walk out without buying a pie because they can’t sell you a meat pie.
posted on 24/9/19
Parliament making measures to stop no deal is not Parliament trying to overturn the referendum result. It amazes me that people with access to the internet cannot see this.
posted on 24/9/19
comment by Finlay Robertson (U1734)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 57 seconds ago
comment by Finlay Robertson (U1734)
posted 12 seconds ago
If you looked at a menu and opted for a pie, then the waiter came over and said that it's a poo filled pie or the option of a pie with no filling. You'd still go with that because you chose a pie. You were told it was delicious. That's why you chose it. Now have your pie and eat it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you are stupid enough to not ask what is in the pie then you're an idiot.
If you bothered to ask and they said it could be anything from steak to shiiiit, you'd take a view and decide accordingly, aware of the potential range of outcomes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was told it was steak before I ordered. Wasn't allowed to change my mind when I found out it was poo or no filling
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who knew poo pie could so eloquently put a leaver in their place.
posted on 24/9/19
*taking measures
posted on 24/9/19
comment by Mason The King Greenwood (U10026)
posted 2 minutes ago
The rest of the post doesn’t support your argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You said it's not because of parliament that we haven't left yet... we would have left if parliament didn't vote for extentions.
posted on 24/9/19
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Better than Goze... (U3126)
posted 17 seconds ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Finlay Robertson (U1734)
posted 12 seconds ago
If you looked at a menu and opted for a pie, then the waiter came over and said that it's a poo filled pie or the option of a pie with no filling. You'd still go with that because you chose a pie. You were told it was delicious. That's why you chose it. Now have your pie and eat it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you are stupid enough to not ask what is in the pie then you're an idiot.
If you bothered to ask and they said it could be anything from steak to shiiiit, you'd take a view and decide accordingly, aware of the potential range of outcomes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your dietary requirements would also not be best served demanding a meat pie in a vegan restaurant.
And then threating the owners that you’ll just walk out without buying a pie because they can’t sell you a meat pie.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Still the pasty for me
posted on 24/9/19
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
Devonshirespur (U6316)
I don't think you understand what 'pedantic' means - there's nothing pedantic about me saying you're being simplistic.
Leave doesn't mean leave.
What was voted for when people selected 'leave' is a myriad of options that no one can agree on.
There's your problem.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?
Remain a member of the European Union
Leave the European Union"
That is the question and the options.
So how does leave not mean leave when given a yes or no question?
posted on 24/9/19
Nick Eardley
PM accuses claimants in Supreme Court case of trying to frustrate Brexit.....
David Allen Green
PM's lawyer told Supreme Court that prorogation has nothing to do with Brexit
posted on 24/9/19
Devonshirespur (U6316)
Yes, and stating that is the question is simplism.
Because it isn't as simple as that.
'Leave' has many different guises. Shouting 'WE VOTED TO LEAVE' ignores the complexities involved.
posted on 24/9/19
No I said it’s not because Parliament is trying to overturnthe result.
posted on 24/9/19
*not trying to overturn
Page 6 of 14
7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11