comment by redmisty (U7556)
posted 1 hour, 8 minutes ago
It's suggested Jose doesn't like using youth players or bringing talent through.
Can anyone name some if these top talents he has wasted ?
______________
Here's a thought...Try asking the people who "suggested" this in the first place. That's how a forum works.
Also, if Jose does not promote youngsters then how on earth is anyone supposed to name the youngsters that he did not promote? Funnily enough, I don't have a detailed database of all the youth teams of every club that Jose has worked for.
Trust this OP to ask a question back to front instead of just looking at which youngsters Jose has actually promoted in his career - like any intelligent person would.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The op has been owned.
VC, yeah and responds saying 'nobody has answered my questions' even when they have.
comment by Wahl Icht (U10322)
posted 7 minutes ago
So do you not actually even have a first choice?
...............
No.
.............
You don't care whoever it is?
..............
I will care if it is someone who I don't think is worthy. for example, I was very much against us appointing Moyes.
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 6 minutes ago
VC, yeah and responds saying 'nobody has answered my questions' even when they have.
..............
You will frequently see myself or MUDd reply with "I have answered your question on page (whatever) you must have missed it, again".
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 9 minutes ago
VC, yeah and responds saying 'nobody has answered my questions' even when they have.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The sad thing is that the poor soul is not as smart as he thinks he is.
If the OP had just asked the question the right way round then this might have been an interesting thread but he is always trying to be too "clever" and apparently lacks the tools to achieve that.
There is always a painfully obvious subtext or not-so-hidden agenda associated with his articles.
Yo, I completely forgot about the original point of this. Yeah, Mourinho don't do shiiit for acadmey players.
comment by Wahl Icht (U10322)
posted 1 minute ago
Yo, I completely forgot about the original point of this. Yeah, Mourinho don't do shiiit for acadmey players.
..............
This is one of my major concerns with Jose considering United's rich history with young players.
Mourinho'll only be there for like three years maybe before he'll look for a new challenge. Can't you put that 'rich history with young players' shiiit to one side for those years and just enjoy the trophies he's gonna bring?
Can't you put that 'rich history with young players' shiiit to one side for those years and just enjoy the trophies he's gonna bring?
____________
Slightly obtuse but I do get your point and I don't entirely disagree with it. The problem is that in 3 years every 19 year old will be 22 and will have moved on. Every 22 year old will be 25 etc. How do you just put your entire youth system on ice for three years and expect youngsters to put in a shift knowing that their only chance of first team football is to leave United?
As ever the best policy is a balance of experience/top quality and youth. We need a manager who can attract the top players that we desperately need but without neglecting the promising young players we already have.
Could United really just turn to Rashford and say "Jose's in next season so we have a new policy. Bye bye"?
Can't you put that 'rich history with young players' shiiit to one side for those years and just enjoy the trophies he's gonna bring?
................
No. But I am sure there are a few of our fans who would.
Hey, its not like they won't develop at all. He could always just loan guys like Rashley out if they're pretty good but he ain't gonna use em.
One player hardly proves the model!
But nah, I mean, maybe a couple of years on loan bro. Dont act like you guys just throw in acadamy players for the hell of it either. Pretty sure you dudes played Fellaini up top ahead of Rashley earlier in the season.
Dont act like you guys just throw in acadamy players for the hell of it either
_______
Only an idiot would!
He could always just loan guys like Rashley out if they're pretty good but he ain't gonna use em.
.............
And that is why you have never seen any success from your academy since JT.
The only reason you dudes are using academy players now is cuz of injuries. If that happens to Mourinho, he ain't gonna have a choice but to play them.
comment by Wahl Icht (U10322)
posted 6 seconds ago
The only reason you dudes are using academy players now is cuz of injuries.
................
That is why we keep them instead of loaning them out.
Alright. So? If you're players didn't get injured Rashley would never have played. Its not like this is some tradition shiiit, Rashley got lucky.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Jose has always ensured that he has plenty of internationals in reserve. Otherwise how is it that none of his youngsters has ever got "lucky" like Rashford?
posted 1 minute ago
Alright. So? If you're players didn't get injured Rashley would never have played. Its not like this is some tradition shiiit, Rashley got lucky.
............
Yes he got lucky. That is how it often works.
But we had him in place to be able to benefit from that luck.
Jose played against us without a striker due to injuries or Costa being banned, can't remember which.
Imagine if you had a youth player to bring in.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Sign in if you want to comment
Jose wastes youth players
Page 18 of 20
16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20
posted on 1/3/16
comment by redmisty (U7556)
posted 1 hour, 8 minutes ago
It's suggested Jose doesn't like using youth players or bringing talent through.
Can anyone name some if these top talents he has wasted ?
______________
Here's a thought...Try asking the people who "suggested" this in the first place. That's how a forum works.
Also, if Jose does not promote youngsters then how on earth is anyone supposed to name the youngsters that he did not promote? Funnily enough, I don't have a detailed database of all the youth teams of every club that Jose has worked for.
Trust this OP to ask a question back to front instead of just looking at which youngsters Jose has actually promoted in his career - like any intelligent person would.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The op has been owned.
posted on 1/3/16
VC, yeah and responds saying 'nobody has answered my questions' even when they have.
posted on 1/3/16
comment by Wahl Icht (U10322)
posted 7 minutes ago
So do you not actually even have a first choice?
...............
No.
.............
You don't care whoever it is?
..............
I will care if it is someone who I don't think is worthy. for example, I was very much against us appointing Moyes.
posted on 1/3/16
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 6 minutes ago
VC, yeah and responds saying 'nobody has answered my questions' even when they have.
..............
You will frequently see myself or MUDd reply with "I have answered your question on page (whatever) you must have missed it, again".
posted on 1/3/16
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 9 minutes ago
VC, yeah and responds saying 'nobody has answered my questions' even when they have.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The sad thing is that the poor soul is not as smart as he thinks he is.
posted on 1/3/16
If the OP had just asked the question the right way round then this might have been an interesting thread but he is always trying to be too "clever" and apparently lacks the tools to achieve that.
There is always a painfully obvious subtext or not-so-hidden agenda associated with his articles.
posted on 1/3/16
Yo, I completely forgot about the original point of this. Yeah, Mourinho don't do shiiit for acadmey players.
posted on 1/3/16
comment by Wahl Icht (U10322)
posted 1 minute ago
Yo, I completely forgot about the original point of this. Yeah, Mourinho don't do shiiit for acadmey players.
..............
This is one of my major concerns with Jose considering United's rich history with young players.
posted on 1/3/16
Mourinho'll only be there for like three years maybe before he'll look for a new challenge. Can't you put that 'rich history with young players' shiiit to one side for those years and just enjoy the trophies he's gonna bring?
posted on 1/3/16
Can't you put that 'rich history with young players' shiiit to one side for those years and just enjoy the trophies he's gonna bring?
____________
Slightly obtuse but I do get your point and I don't entirely disagree with it. The problem is that in 3 years every 19 year old will be 22 and will have moved on. Every 22 year old will be 25 etc. How do you just put your entire youth system on ice for three years and expect youngsters to put in a shift knowing that their only chance of first team football is to leave United?
As ever the best policy is a balance of experience/top quality and youth. We need a manager who can attract the top players that we desperately need but without neglecting the promising young players we already have.
Could United really just turn to Rashford and say "Jose's in next season so we have a new policy. Bye bye"?
posted on 1/3/16
Can't you put that 'rich history with young players' shiiit to one side for those years and just enjoy the trophies he's gonna bring?
................
No. But I am sure there are a few of our fans who would.
posted on 1/3/16
Hey, its not like they won't develop at all. He could always just loan guys like Rashley out if they're pretty good but he ain't gonna use em.
posted on 1/3/16
For three years?
posted on 1/3/16
We did it with Courtois.
posted on 1/3/16
One player hardly proves the model!
posted on 1/3/16
But nah, I mean, maybe a couple of years on loan bro. Dont act like you guys just throw in acadamy players for the hell of it either. Pretty sure you dudes played Fellaini up top ahead of Rashley earlier in the season.
posted on 1/3/16
Dont act like you guys just throw in acadamy players for the hell of it either
_______
Only an idiot would!
posted on 1/3/16
He could always just loan guys like Rashley out if they're pretty good but he ain't gonna use em.
.............
And that is why you have never seen any success from your academy since JT.
posted on 1/3/16
The only reason you dudes are using academy players now is cuz of injuries. If that happens to Mourinho, he ain't gonna have a choice but to play them.
posted on 1/3/16
comment by Wahl Icht (U10322)
posted 6 seconds ago
The only reason you dudes are using academy players now is cuz of injuries.
................
That is why we keep them instead of loaning them out.
posted on 1/3/16
Alright. So? If you're players didn't get injured Rashley would never have played. Its not like this is some tradition shiiit, Rashley got lucky.
posted on 1/3/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 1/3/16
Jose has always ensured that he has plenty of internationals in reserve. Otherwise how is it that none of his youngsters has ever got "lucky" like Rashford?
posted on 1/3/16
posted 1 minute ago
Alright. So? If you're players didn't get injured Rashley would never have played. Its not like this is some tradition shiiit, Rashley got lucky.
............
Yes he got lucky. That is how it often works.
But we had him in place to be able to benefit from that luck.
Jose played against us without a striker due to injuries or Costa being banned, can't remember which.
Imagine if you had a youth player to bring in.
posted on 1/3/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Page 18 of 20
16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20